St. Louis Post-Dispatch Letters to the editor, Oct 31, 2016 (12 comments)
Amendment 3 is not what it appears to be
I thought surely I was having a bad dream when I read the Post-Dispatch’s support (Oct. 24) for Constitutional Amendment 3 — the Trojan horse masquerading as a worthy source of funding for early childhood health and education programs.
Ever since 2006 when the Missouri Stem Cell Amendment was passed, I have had a good dream — a bright and hopeful dream — of research that could result in cures for diseases such as type 1 diabetes, Parkinson’s and others. But the many strings attached to this amendment could set back earlier victories that opened the way for critical medical research. The fact that it is bankrolled by R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Co. should be a clue that this is not what it appears to be.
If the Post-Dispatch is so certain that its judgment trumps that of organizations such as Washington University, the American Cancer Society, the American Heart Association and many others of equal pedigree on record opposing the amendment, could it not at least make mention that others have thoughtful and legitimate reasons to take exception — and why?
While I would never dispute the need for funding for early childhood education, it seems clear that this is not the way to do it.
I urge voters to consider other editorial voices of the state’s major newspapers who see the proposition for the sham that it is.
Marianna Riley • Webster Groves