Reminder: A comment for consideration must be accompanied by your full name. First name only or a pseudonym is not normally accepted. Also, please limit your comment to 1,000 characters, which is twice that set by the St. Louis Post-Dispatch. Finally, please avoid epithets and personal attacks.
After seeing this report earlier this year I wanted to verify that it wasn’t likely to be found flawed after publishing it on the mogasp blog. Dr. Michael Siegel, Associate Chairman, Social & Behavioral Sciences
Professor, Social & Behavioral Sciences, Boston University School of Public Health, provided reassurance that it was a reliable study in his e-mail reply below:
From: Dr. Mike Siegel
Subject: RE: New study: Bars and restaurants did well in Smoke-free Wisconsin cities
Date: January 30, 2011 3:28:51 PM CST
The study looks solid to me.
The only studies which tend to be problematic it seems are those which look at the effect of smoke-free laws on heart attacks. The economic studies are generally solid.
The newspaper article is pasted in full below, together with a link to the study itself.
New study: Bars and restaurants did well in Smoke-free Wisconsin cities
Milwaukee Courier 29 JANUARY 2011
Analysis shows ordinances enacted before state law did not harm hospitality industry
Roughly six months into Wisconsin’s statewide smokefree law, a new study offers further proof that getting the smoke out is good for health and good for business.
The study, done by the UW Carbone Cancer Center, compared economic data between five Wisconsin cities that enacted smoke-free ordinances before the statewide law and similar cities where workplace smoking was still permitted.
The results showed bars and restaurants in the smokefree cities continued to do well under the ordinances. In fact, in virtually every smokefree community the number of Class B alcohol licenses increased after the ordinances took effect and employment remained strong despite the recession.
“This is excellent news for employers and employees in the hospitality industry,” said Gail Sumi, Wisconsin Government Relations director for the American Cancer Society.
“This study, like dozens of similar studies nationwide, offers more proof that going smoke-free does not pit business against health, but rather is a common sense health law that keeps workers and employers both physically and fiscally healthy.”
The study looked at a number of factors in Madison, Appleton, Eau Claire, Marshfield and Fond du Lac including:
The number of alcohol licenses issued to bars and restaurants
The number of establishments operating before and after the ordinance
The number of employees in the year before the ordinance took effect and the following years after
Despite the significant economic recession of 2008, the study found the hospitality industry to be the most economically successful industry in the smoke-free cities. Employment in the industry remained high and overall there were no significant differences in economic trends between those with and without smokefree ordinances.
“Today’s study coupled with state data showing widespread compliance with the new law is encouraging. It shows the law is working to protecting workers from the serious health effects of secondhand smoke exposure while still enabling businesses to adapt and thrive,” said Sumi. “Wisconsin really is better smoke-free.”
To see the full study please visit: http://sep.uwcarbone.wisc.edu/
Popular Interests In This Article: American Cancer Society, Hospitality Businesses, SmokeFree Wisconsin, UW Carbone Cancer Center